Does Germany require COI/DOI?

What is COI/DOI? It's just address validation and permission verification -- you send a welcome or verification message and the recipient has to click on a link to prove they want the subscription. And it's not a new thing, here's me talking about it on this very blog fifteen years ago.

Note: I think the terms "double opt-in" and "confirmed opt-in" are interchangeable. I find that most of the time, internet security and anti-spam folks call it COI, and marketers and some deliverability folks (like me!) call it DOI. When doing so, they refer to the same process of requiring an active response to the initial welcome or verification email.

There are a lot of good reasons to implement COI/DOI, but today's specific question is -- does Germany "require" it? Ultimately this is a legal question, and I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not qualified to answer legal questions. But I can share and link to what other folks have said on this topic, so that's what I will do.

First, Litmus has this excellent article on international opt-in requirements that they published in 2016. They say: "German courts have decided that a single opt-in process is not sufficient proof of prior consent. They argue that  a person other than the owner of an email could have entered the address in a form. Even though there is no law that explicitly requires a double opt-in in Germany, 45% of German brands have adopted this process as best practice—just to be on the safe side."

I am told that the case law referenced in the Litmus article is a good place to start for understanding where the COI/DOI requirement comes from. If you can speak the language, I suggest diving into the linked Teradata case study for more information.

This 2012 article from the German E-Mail Marketing Tipps blog may be getting a bit dusty, but suggests a similar answer: "Double opt-in is not legally mandated in Germany. But it is recommended in many scenarios. Without a well-documented DOI you may not be able to prove permission, depending on the judge."

This Lexology article from 2014 says, "2013 guidelines advise a double opt-in for consent provided electronically."

The Certified Senders Alliance, a centralized European whitelist provided this brief guidance in 2017: "DOI: if not now, then when?!" For more detail, this CSA/ECO guide (see section 2.10) provides additional guidance.

German law firm "IT-Recht Kanzlei" who seems to focus on IT law, published this guidance in August 2018: E-Mail-Marketing 2018: What changes in the DSGVO regarding newsletters?

And finally, what do ISPs say? Here's one example of a reply from a German-based ISP that a friend was kind enough to share with me. The ISP said, "As you surely know the sender needs to have recipients Double-Opt-in/Closed-Loop-Opt-in confirmed before mailing to German residents to comply with the German Bundesdatenschutzgesetz."

Got any additional information or links to share? Feel free to leave information in comments below.

How to Recover from Email Marketing Mistakes

Whoops! Email launch error. Wrong content? Wrong list? Broken images? Exposed mail merge variables? What do you do? Litmus's Chad White helps you break it down with a series of simple questions.

The future of email?

From Dot Magazine: Email has been around a long time now, but it’s still got a lot of life left in it. Marcel Becker from Oath explains how email will evolve in the future.

(Oath, if you don't recall, is the company managing the AOL and Yahoo Mail platforms.)

H/T: Anthony Chiulli.

Reference: All AT&T Email Domains

AT&T has a Postmaster site, but it doesn't contain a comprehensive list of their inbound email domains. However, they do have a help page for AT&T users looking to configure their email client, and it does list all of their inbound email domains.

From that help page, here is a list of all AT&T consumer email domains:
ameritech.net
att.net
bellsouth.net
flash.net
nvbell.net
pacbell.net
prodigy.net
sbcglobal.net
snet.net
swbell.net
wans.net

AT&T users used to be able to read their mail via Yahoo Mail's web user interface, but this seems to no longer be an option as of sometime in 2016-2018. Thus, in the past, AT&T and Yahoo filtering might have been related (especially spam folder delivery), but I think that is no longer the case.

Special thanks to reader Laurence Marks, who provided much of this information in a past comment. Thanks!

Are any domains missing? Leave a comment with corrections, feedback or questions.

Sender ID? No, don't bother.

Back in 2016 I pointed out that Sender ID no longer matters. It's still true today!

Indeed, the RFCs for Sender ID are being moved to "historic" status -- indicating it's not an active standard.