Over the past week or so, I've been fixing a few hundred older posts that became corrupted a few years ago. The net result is that some posts from 2016 or earlier may now have new URLs, leading to the occasional broken link. I'm in the process of reviewing and fixing any broken links that I can find. If you happen to notice any yourself, let me know? And I apologize for any inconvenience. I hate broken links. But it was a necessary evil, to restore a chunk of blog content properly.
And what about all of those older blog posts, anyway?
It's always a tough call when it comes to answering the question, how much blog history should I keep linked and active? While I generally believe in maintaining everything for the historical record, there's posts from years ago warning about long-resolved mailbox provider downtimes, and entries talking about companies or platforms that no longer exist. Thus, I've decided to prune just a bit of things here and there. If you've got an opinion on that, I'd love to hear it. Drop me a line.
Over the past week or so, I've been fixing a few hundred older posts that became corrupted a few years ago. The net result is that some posts from 2016 or earlier may now have new URLs, leading to the occasional broken link. I'm in the process of reviewing and fixing any broken links that I can find. If you happen to notice any yourself, let me know? And I apologize for any inconvenience. I hate broken links. But it was a necessary evil, to restore a chunk of blog content properly.
And what about all of those older blog posts, anyway?
As always, thanks for reading!
Comments
Post a Comment
Comments policy: Al is always right. Kidding, mostly. Be polite, please and thank you.