Third party post-purchase research emails: spam?
My wife and I were lucky enough to be able to purchase a new car earlier this year. It's a n…
My wife and I were lucky enough to be able to purchase a new car earlier this year. It's a n…
First published in 2005 , the FCC's Wireless Domains list was intended to be a list of doma…
Ever seen the @InterestingSBLs twitter account? It's kind of interesting and occasionally en…
MailChimp's John Foreman explains the usual reasons why sending to purchased lists is a bad …
From Brian Krebs: "The backdrop of the story is a long-running turf war between two of the …
Probably, implies Return Path based on a correlation between a typical Spamhaus blacklisting an…
A friendly representative of a company who helps small businesses sell products asked: "We…
Smart web developer and systems admin Mike Cardwell put together something neat that I think you…
DMARC (specifically, DMARC with a p=reject policy) does one thing: It makes it very difficult fo…
Allow me to share with you my rough notes compiled during my recent configuration of email and D…
If you've ever set up catch-all domain names, that accept mail destined to any address, …
A few weeks ago, somebody on the Mailop list asked about an email they received. Turns out, it w…
For my server running the discussion mailing lists that I host, I'm running OpenDKIM, OpenDM…
What impact has Yahoo's new "p=reject" DMARC policy had on spam claiming to be fro…
Michael Adkins, Mail Integrity Engineer at Facebook summarizes it thusly : "STARTTLS encr…
As reported on the Mailop list today, Yahoo has modified their Yahoo Groups discussion group se…
Campaign Monitor's Andrew Bonar reports on the takeaways from a recent presentation and Q&a…
That's a question I get asked from time to time, so I figured this would be a good place to …
Now that Yahoo and AOL have both implemented "p=reject" DMARC policies, Google has m…
Today, AOL announced that they, too, have adopted a "p=reject" DMARC policy . The same…
Surprise! Or was it? I've been warning for a while now that DMARC doesn't play nice with…
All this talk about Yahoo's recent DMARC policy change got a friend to ask me about her dom…
Yesterday, Yahoo posted " an Update on our DMARC Policy to Protect Our Users ." They&#…
How dare Yahoo update their DMARC policy without warning the internet community of the potentia…
Yahoo's recent DMARC policy change didn't just break somebody's church list. It als…
In the next chapter in the story of Yahoo's recent DMARC policy change , Andrew Barrett shar…
Yahoo's recent DMARC policy changes have made it so that Yahoo subscribers will now have tro…
A few days ago, Yahoo updated their DMARC policy setting to "p=reject." What this mean…
I have no problem helping a client address deliverability issues, even if their industry or poli…
The WHOIS process and protocol isn't just some nerd thing that goes back a hundred years; i…
The Apache Software Foundation just announced the release of SpamAssassin 3.4.0 via a message po…
As reported over on the iDownload blog (and as mentioned to me by others), Gmail had a signific…
On January 9th, Google announced that your Google+ contacts (people in your G+ circles) will now…